Signer of the times


signer of the times

By Trevor Watkins

Even in death, Madiba provided a last great service to South Africa. His bungled Gauteng memorial illustrated to a huge and influential audience the depth of incompetence to which the South African government under ANC rule has sunk. The serious consequences of cadre deployment, lack of accountability, race-based rather than merit-based hiring practices, insufficient due diligence, all these were on display. Fortunately, in a peculiarly South African way, the results were hilarious rather than disastrous.

The irony of the signing debacle is just so glorious. For once, only the deaf knew what was really going on. Millions watching, all senses intact, had no clue of the drama unfolding. The ponderous platitudes of the politicians were reduced to meaningless gibberish. The much vaunted security arrangements were a mockery. The most media-exposed man on the day, with more camera-time than all the presidents put together, was a nut job with violent tendencies. And balls of steel.

Despite owning a weather service, no one in government thought to check the weather forecast before planning. Despite an entire cabinet portfolio for people with disabilities, no one could find an adequate sign language interpreter. Despite owning a security agency, a grossly overfunded VIP protection unit, a military intelligence unit, a police force, nobody found time to check the security clearance of the man who would stand within metres of dozens of heads of state. All this despite having had weeks if not months to prepare and plan for this inevitable event. Thank the stars that Madiba can only die once.

I think we have witnessed a new moment in history, a turning point, an epiphany. Like Chamberlain’s “Peace in our time”, Macmillan’s “Winds of change”, George Bush’s “Mission accomplished”, our recent “Don’t touch me on my studio”,our beloved signer has encapsulated in a few silent words the ethos, the zeitgeist of our times, “Fog donkey. Cigarette. Balls”

Advertisements

  1. #1 by Ron Weissenberg on January 3, 2016 - 1:23 pm

    In your excellent synopsis of all that is rotten in a westernised version of what South Africa could be, you may be indirectly generating more support for the ruling party.
    An increasing body of evidence suggests that when white middle-aged males (I’m now one of them) condemn the ruling party or their officials on just about any level, the effect on the voting majority is to galvanise and consolidate support and praise.
    In SA, there are enormous cultural and social differences between groups, compounded by a state-supported racial divide. I doubt the performance of the signer, the municipality, the province, the country or the minions who operate the public service have any moral or ethical connection to the event.
    The recent finance minister debacle was almost universally condemned – but for very different reasons. The lack of party, collectivist consultation and operating as an individual within a collective (the very thing an Executive President should do), was far more of an issue to the majority than the effect on the economy, the country’s status or the future wellbeing of SA citizens.
    SA is a great retirement destination. There are far more appropriate life journeys though.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: